INTAKE OF ACETAMINOPHEN SUPPRESSES ANTIVIRAL HUMORAL IMMUNE RESPONSES IN PATIENTS WITH RA FOLLOWING VACCINATION WITH ANTI SARS-CoV-2 mRNA BASED VACCINES

BackgroundAcetaminophen (APAP = paracetamol) may potentially impact vaccine-associated immune responses as the intake of APAP has been associated with a worse outcome in tumor patients receiving checkpoint inhibitors.[1]Different DMARD regimen have been shown to impair the humoral immune response to mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with rheumatoid arthritis but the effect of paracetamol has not been explored thus far.ObjectivesTo analyse whether the intake of APAP may interfere with antiviral humoral immune responses following two doses of an anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA based vaccine in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on DMARD therapy.MethodsThe RECOVER trial (Rheumatoid Covid-19 Vaccine Immune Response) was a non-randomised, prospective observational control group trial and enrolled 77 RA patients on DMARD therapy and 21 healthy controls (HC). We performed a posthoc analysis of blood samples taken before the first vaccine dose (T0), two (T1) and three (T2) weeks after the first and second vaccine dose, and at 12 (T3) weeks. APAP intake was measured using ELISA. The antibody response (anti-S) to the receptor binding domain (RBD) within the SARS-CoV-2 S1 protein was measured with the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2-S (Roche Diagnostics GmbH) test. The neutralizing activity NT50 at week 12 was assessed using an HIV-based pseudovirus neutralization assay against Wuhan-Hu-1.ResultsBaseline characteristics of participants are detailed in Table 1. The immunogenicity analyses were based on 73 RA patients after exclusion of 4 patients with previously unnoticed SARS-CoV-2 infection (positive for anti-nucleoprotein at baseline). APAP was detected in serum samples from 34/73 (25%) RA patients and in 7/21 (33%) HC (least at one timepoint T0, T1 and/or T2). APAP intake in HC did not affect levels of anti-S at any timepoint and all HC developed potent neutralizing activity (NT50 ≥ 250) at week 12. RA patients, who tested positive for APAP at T1, showed comparable anti-S levels at T1, T2 and T3 compared to RA patients not exposed to APAP. The detection of APAP at T2 corresponded to lower anti-S levels at T2 (Figure 1 A, B). The detection of APAP at T2 was associated with a significantly lower SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing activity at week 12 compared to patients without perivaccination APAP exposure (p =0.04) (Figure 1 C).ConclusionA decrease of antiviral humoral immune responses was observed in RA patients (but not in HC) who were exposed to APAP at the time of the second mRNA vaccine dose compared to patients in whom APAP was not detected. Our data suggest that the use of paracetamol within the time period around vaccination may impair vaccine-induced immune responses in patients with an already higher risk for blunted immune responses.Reference[1]Bessede A et al. Ann Oncol 2022;33: 909-915Table 1.Baseline characteristics: RA patients and HC with/without APAP exposureRA APAP – n = 37RA APAP + n = 36p-valueHC APAP – n = 8HC APAP + n = 13p-valueAge (yrs), mean (± SD)62 (13)67 (10)0.07 (NS)45 (12)44 (14)0.90 (NS)Female sex, n (%)24 (65)19 (53)0.29 (NS)2 (25)5 (38)0.53 (NS)Vaccination type/schedulemRNA-1273, n (%)4 (11)8 (22.2)0.19 (NS)0 (0)0 (0)BNT162b2, n (%)33 (89)28 (77.8)0.19 (NS)8 (100)13 (100)RA disease characteristicsACPA ± RF, n (%)17/37 (46)19/36 (53)0.56 (NS)NANANARA disease duration (yrs ± SD)9.2 (9.8)10.2 (8.1)0.67 (NS)NANANADMARD therapycsDMARD-mono, n (%)13/37 (35)9/36 (25)0.35 (NS)NANANAbDMARD-mono/combo, n (%)16/37 (43)16/36 (44)0.92 (NS)NANANAtsDMARDs-mono/combo, n (%)8/37 (22)11/36 (31)0.38 (NS)NANANAPrednisone, n (%)15/37 (41)12/36 (33.3)0.52 (NS)NANANAMean daily dose prednisone (mg ± SD)4.6 ± 1.13.9 ± 2.30.39 (NS)NANANA* APAP = acetaminophenFigure 1.Acknowledgements:NIL.Disclosure of InterestsNone Declared.

Immunotherapy: SYNERGISTIC PERITONEAL ANTI-TUMOR EFFECT OF ALLOCETRAOTS, A CELLULAR IMMUNE-THERAPY, IN COMBINATION WITH IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS/CHEMOTHERAPY, THROUGH IN-VIVO REPROGRAMMING OF MACROPHAGES AND DENDRITIC CELLS

Background & Aim: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) revolutionized solid tumor treatment, however, in many tumors only partial response is achieved. Allocetra-OTS has an immune modulating effect on macrophages and dendritic cells and showed an excellent safety profile in patients including patients with sepsis and Covid-19. Here we investigated the anti-tumoral effect of Allocetra-OTS cellular therapy, in peritoneal solid tumor animal models. Methods, Results & Conclusion(s): Allocetra-OTS is manufactured from enriched mononuclear fractions and induced to undergo early apoptosis. Balb/c mice were inoculated intraperitoneally (IP) with AB12 (mesothelioma) with pLenti-PGK-V5-Luc-Neo and treated with anti- CTLA4 with or without Allocetra-OTS. Mice were monitored daily for clinical score and weekly using IVIS (Fig.1). Kaplan-Meier log rank test was done for survival. For Allocetra-OTS preparation, enriched mononuclear fractions were collected by leukapheresis from healthy eligible human donors and induced to undergo early apoptosis. Anti- CTLA4 standalone therapy significantly improved survival (Fig.2) from mean 34+/-9 to 44.9 +/-20 days. However, OTS standalone therapy was non-inferior and improved survival to 52.3 +/-20 days. Anti-CTLA4 + Allocetra-OTS combination therapy, ameliorated survival to 86.7+/-20 days with complete cancer remission in 60-100% of mice. Similar anti- tumoral effects of Allocetra-OTS were seen in mesothelioma model in a combination therapy with either anti-PD1 or cisplatin and using anti-PD1 in ID8 ovary cancer model. Based on single cell analysis confirmed by flow cytometry and pathology, the mechanism of action seems to be related or at least associated with an increase in f/480high peritoneal macrophages and a decrease in recruited macrophages, and to f/480high infiltration of the tumor. However, further studies are needed to confirm these observations. During IP tumor progression, Allocetra-OTS as a standalone therapy or in combination with ICI, or cisplatin, significantly reduced tumor size and resulted in complete remission in up to 100% treated mice. Similar results were obtained in ID8 ovary cancer. Based on excellent safety profile in > 50 patients treated in prior clinical trials for sepsis and Covid-19, Phase I/II clinical trial of Allocetra-OTS plus chemotherapy has started and three patient already recruited. A second phase I/II clinical trial of Allocetra- OTS plus anti-PD1, as a second- and third-line therapy in various cancers, was initiated in Q1 2023. [Figure presented]Copyright © 2023 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy

Sensitizing breast cancers to immune checkpoint inhibitors through CD27 agonism and vaccination against tumor-associated antigen

Project objective: Despite the recent revolution in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), only modest improvement in overall survival and likely caused by not enough potent cellular immunity among BC patients. Our lab has been focus on inducing cellular immunity against HER2+ BC through vaccination against the tumor-associated antigen HER2. Approximately 20 years ago, we performed an experimental pilot study by administrating HER2 peptide and recombinant protein pulsed dendritic cells (DC vaccine) to six patients with refractory HER2+ advanced or metastatic (stage II (>= 6 +LN), III, or stage IV) BC. We followed the patients on 2019 found that all of the six patients were still alive, 18 years after vaccination. Their blood sample were analyzed with cytometry by time-offlight (CyTOF) and found there is a significantly increased presence of CD27 expressing memory T cells in response to HER2 peptide stimulation. Recent report on the SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccine also suggested that CD27 expressing memory T cells plays a critical role in long-lasting cellular immunity against SARS-CoV2 infection. Therefore, we hypothesized that CD27 plays a critical role in cellular immunity against BC, and the stimulation of CD27 expressing T cells with mAb targeting CD27 significantly increase the cellular immunity triggered by vaccination against tumor-associated antigen. Result(s): We recapitulate the rise of CD27+ antigen specific T cells among the vaccinated patients using a transgenic mouse model expressing human CD27. When combined the adenoviral-vector based HER2 (Ad-HER2) vaccination with a single dose of human aCD27 antibody (Varlilumab), we found there is a robust increase in the HER2 specific T cells compared to vaccination alone, especially CD27+CD44+ memory CD4 T cells, even after 120 days post vaccination. Using an ICIinsensitive syngeneic HER2+ BC models, we found 50% of mice in the combination group of aCD27 antibody plus Ad-HER2 showed total tumor regression by the end of study. When combined with anti-PD1 antibody, the combination of AdHER2 and Varlilumab leads to total tumor regression in 90% of tumor bearing mice with syngeneic HER2+ BC, indicating that the vaccination against tumor associated antigen HER2 plus anti-CD27 antibody sensitized ICI-insensitive HER2+ BC toward ICI. Conclusion(s): Our data demonstrates that the administration of anti-CD27 antibody significantly increase the long term presence of CD27+ antigen specific memory T cells after vaccination against tumor associated antigen HER2. As consequence, combination of anti-CD27 with HER2 sensitized the immune unresponsive breast cancer toward anti-PD1 antibody. Our study suggests that the vaccination against tumor-associated antigen with mAb targeting CD27 leads to the robust cellular immunity, which is required for successful ICIs against breast cancer.

COVID-19 vaccines in patients with solid tumor cancers receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background: The interaction between checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) and Sars-COV-2 vaccines has been understudied. One potential complication in pts receiving CPI is immune-mediated adverse events (irAEs) resulting from overactivation of the immune system. It is unknown whether concurrent CPI and Sars-COV-2 vaccine administration increases the risk of irAEs. This retrospective study examined the incidence of severe irAEs in cancer patients receiving CPI therapy at the time of vaccination against Sars CoV-2. Method(s): Following IRB approval, pts with solid tumors who received any approved CPI since FDA authorization of the COVID-19 vaccine in December 2020 were identified via institutional electronic health record. Pts who received one or more doses of an authorized vaccine within 60 days of CPI treatment were included. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the incidence of severe irAE (one or more of the following: grade 3 AE or above, multi-system involvement, need for hospitalization). Secondary endpoints included time between CPI and vaccination, need for immunosuppressive therapy, and rate of discontinuation of CPI due to irAE. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. Result(s): 290 pts with bladder, head/neck, liver, skin (melanoma, SCC), renal, and gynecologic cancer were included in analysis. The median age was 67 years (IQR: 59.0-74.0) and 66% pts were male. At the time of vaccination, 201 pts (69.3%) received CPI monotherapy, 53 pts (18.3%) received combination (combo) CPI therapy, and 36 pts (12.4%) received other therapies (chemo, TKIs, etc.) with CPI. The vaccine manufacturer was Pfizer Bio-N-Tech in 162 pts (55.9%), Moderna in 122 pts (42.1%), and Johnson and Johnson in 6 pts (2.1%). The number of vaccinations received was >/= 3 in 214 pts, 2 in 64 pts, and 1 in 11 pts. 30 pts (11.5%) experienced severe irAEs following vaccination. The rate of severe irAEs was 10.3% (30/290) in the total population [6% (12/201) with CPI monotherapy, 19% (10/53) with combo CPI, and 22% (8/36) in the combo CPI-other group]. Severe irAEs occurred after the first vaccine dose in 5 pts (16.7%), second dose in 16 pts (53.3%), and third dose in 9 pts (30%) pts. The median time between CPI treatment and vaccination in pts who experienced irAE was15.5 days (IQR: 10.2-23.0). Hospitalization was required for 19 patients (63.3%). 24 pts (80.0%) required immunosuppressive therapy with a median therapy duration of 98.5 days (IQR 40.2-173.0). 16 pts (53.5%) discontinued CPI therapy following severe irAEs Conclusion(s): In this retrospective study, we observed a 10.3% rate of severe irAE in cancer pts receiving CPI concurrently with COVID-19 vaccines. Further investigation in pts with additional cancer types is warranted to help determine best practice guidelines for COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients receiving CPI.

Myocarditis and autoimmunity.

INTRODUCTION: Autoimmune myocarditis may develop due to heterogeneous causes. Myocarditis is often caused by viral infections, but it can also be caused by systemic autoimmune diseases. Immune checkpoint inhibitors and virus vaccines induce immune activation, and they can cause the development of myocarditis, as well as several immune-related adverse events. The development of myocarditis is dependent on the genetic factors of the host, and the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) may be an important determinant of the type and severity of the disease. However, non-MHC immunoregulatory genes may also play a role in determining susceptibility. AREA COVERED: This review summarizes the current knowledge of the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of autoimmune myocarditis with a particular focus on viral infection, autoimmunity, and biomarkers of myocarditis. EXPERT OPINION: An endomyocardial biopsy may not be the gold standard for the diagnosis of myocarditis. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is useful in diagnosing autoimmune myocarditis. Recently identified biomarkers of inflammation and myocyte injury are promising for the diagnosis of myocarditis when measured simultaneously. Future treatments should focus on the appropriate diagnosis of the etiologic agent, as well as on the specific stage of the evolution of immune and inflammatory processes.

Modeling the Tumor Microenvironment and Cancer Immunotherapy in Next-Generation Humanized Mice.

Cancer immunotherapy has brought significant clinical benefits to numerous patients with malignant disease. However, only a fraction of patients experiences complete and durable responses to currently available immunotherapies. This highlights the need for more effective immunotherapies, combination treatments and predictive biomarkers. The molecular properties of a tumor, intratumor heterogeneity and the tumor immune microenvironment decisively shape tumor evolution, metastasis and therapy resistance and are therefore key targets for precision cancer medicine. Humanized mice that support the engraftment of patient-derived tumors and recapitulate the human tumor immune microenvironment of patients represent a promising preclinical model to address fundamental questions in precision immuno-oncology and cancer immunotherapy. In this review, we provide an overview of next-generation humanized mouse models suitable for the establishment and study of patient-derived tumors. Furthermore, we discuss the opportunities and challenges of modeling the tumor immune microenvironment and testing a variety of immunotherapeutic approaches using human immune system mouse models.

Addison's Disease: Diagnosis and Management Strategies.

We aim to overview Addison's disease (AD) with regard to current diagnosis and management. This is a narrative review of full-length articles published in English between January 2022 and December 2022 (including online ahead of print versions) in PubMed-indexed journals. We included original studies in living humans regardless of the level of statistical significance starting from the key search terms "Addison's disease" or "primary adrenal insufficiency" in title or abstract. We excluded articles with secondary adrenal insufficiency. Briefly, 199 and 355 papers, respectively were identified; we manually checked each of them, excluded the duplicates, and then selected 129 based on their clinical relevance in order to address our 1-year analysis. We organized the data in different subsections covering all published aspects on the subject of AD. To our knowledge, this is the largest AD retrospective from 2022 on published data. A massive role of genetic diagnosis especially in pediatric cases is highlighted; the importance of both pediatric and adult awareness remains since unusual presentations continue to be described. COVID-19 infection is a strong player amid this third year of pandemic although we still not do have large cohorts in this particular matter as seen, for instance, in thyroid anomalies. In our opinion, the most important topic for research is immune checkpoint inhibitors, which cause a large panel of endocrine side effects, AD being one of them.

CD71+ erythroid cells suppress T-cell effector functions and predict immunotherapy outcomes in patients with virus-associated solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of cancer. However, only a portion of patients respond to such treatments. Therefore, it remains a prevailing clinical need to identify factors associated with acquired resistance or lack of response to ICIs. We hypothesized that the immunosuppressive CD71+ erythroid cells (CECs) within the tumor and/or distant 'out-of-field' may impair antitumor response. METHODS: We studied 38 patients with cancer through a phase II clinical trial investigating the effects of oral valproate combined with avelumab (anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)) in virus-associated solid tumors (VASTs). We quantified the frequency/functionality of CECs in blood and biopsies of patients. Also, we established an animal model of melanoma (B16-F10) to investigate the possible effects of erythropoietin (EPO) treatment on anti-PD-L1 therapy. RESULTS: We found a substantial expansion of CECs in the blood of patients with VAST compared with healthy controls. We noted that the frequency of CECs in circulation was significantly higher at the baseline and throughout the study in non-responders versus responders to PD-L1 therapy. Moreover, we observed that CECs in a dose-dependent manner suppress effector functions of autologous T cells in vitro. The subpopulation of CD45+CECs appears to have a more robust immunosuppressive property compared with their CD45- counterparts. This was illustrated by a stronger expression of reactive oxygen species, PD-L1/PD-L2, and V-domain Ig suppressor of T-cell activation in this subpopulation. Lastly, we found a higher frequency of CECs in the blood circulation at the later cancer stage and their abundance was associated with anemia, and a poor response to immunotherapy. Finally, we report the expansion of CECs in the spleen and tumor microenvironment of mice with melanoma. We found that although CECs in tumor-bearing mice secret artemin, this was not the case for VAST-derived CECs in humans. Notably, our results imply that EPO, a frequently used drug for anemia treatment in patients with cancer, may promote the generation of CECs and subsequently abrogates the therapeutic effects of ICIs (eg, anti-PD-L1). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that anemia by the expansion of CECs may enhance cancer progression. Notably, measuring the frequency of CECs may serve as a valuable biomarker to predict immunotherapy outcomes.

Comment on: 'Should We Interfere with the Interleukin-6 Receptor During COVID-19: What Do We Know?'/Authors' Reply to Chia Siang Kow et al.: Comment on: 'Should We Interfere with the Interleukin-6 Receptor During COVID-19: What Do We Know So Far?'

[...]the mortality reduction has previously been reported in the prospective meta-analysis [2] conducted by The WHO Rapid Evidence Appraisal for COVID-19 Therapies (REACT) Working Group. Nonetheless, owing to relatively scarce evidence, it is still unclear whether monoclonal IL-6 antibodies reduce mortality in patients with COVID-19, similar to the IL-6 receptor inhibitors. [...]large-scale randomised trials should also be conducted to establish the role of monoclonal IL-6 antibodies in the treatment of COVID-19. [...]among hypothetical long-term complications, peripheral neuropathy would also be noticeable [10] and may contribute to the broad long COVID pattern. [...]there is a theoretical risk of altering the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors during tumour disease management [11].

Ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)

Ablation includes ethanol injection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), etc. Ablation can be potentially curative, minimally invasive and easily repeatable for recurrence. RFA has been the most widely used ablation technique for liver tumors. The new-generation MWA system incorporating antenna cooling and high-power generation has attracted attention. It can create a more predictable ablation zone and a larger ablation volume in a shorter procedure time. Many high-volume centers have introduced new-generation MWA in Japan. However, many studies failed to show that new-generation MWA is superior to RFA in terms of local control and overall survival. In MWA, clinical data have been insufficient compared with those of RFA. There has been keen competition between surgical resection and ablation for almost 40 years since the era of ethanol injection. In 2021, SURF trial revealed that overall survival and recurrence-free survival were not significantly different between surgical resection and RFA. SURF trial was a multicenter randomized controlled trial in which 49 major centers in Japan enrolled patients with good hepatic function (Child-Pugh scores <= 7) and primary HCC of largest diameter <= 3 cm, and <= 3 nodules during the 6-year period of 2009-2015. The registered patients were followed for at least 5 years. As the result of SURF trial and other comparative studies, the revised Japanese clinical practice guidelines in 2021 treats hepatic resection and ablation equally for patients with <= 3 lesions, <= 3 cm in diameter. Recently, the combination of systemic and locoregional therapies has been attracting much attention. Systemic therapy using molecular targeted agents or immune checkpoint inhibitors is used for advanced HCC which cannot be treated by surgery or ablation. On the other hand, some locoregional therapies, such as hepatectomy and ablation, are potentially curative, but they cannot be indicated for advanced HCC. Combination of both therapies is an approach to improve the prognosis of advanced HCC, which is not indicated for curative treatment. Systemic therapy is used to shrink the tumor, and then locoregional therapies are performed to eradicate it. The combination may build a new strategy for advanced HCC. Ablation is highly operator-dependent. The skills and outcomes are very different from operator to operator. Before the pandemic of COVID-19, we held domestic and international training programs for intermediate and advanced doctors and hands-on seminars for young doctors. These were activities to exchange knowledge and experience and standardize the procedure. During the pandemic, we cannot get together. Since August 2020, we have conducted Japan Ablation Webinar 8 times with a total of 1,566 participants. We have also conducted International Ablation Webinar 4 times with a total of 1,272 participated doctors. Education is important to acquire skills and knowledge for successful ablation. We have established Japan Academy of Tumor Ablation (JATA) this year. There are two triggers. One is that SURF trial revealed that there is no difference between hepatectomy and ablation. The other is that ablation for lung, bone and soft tissue and kidney cancers has become reimbursed with health insurance since this September.

Check Point SOS! A Case of Cemiplimab-Associated Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome

Introduction: Hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) or sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS), is a clinical syndrome characterized by hepatomegaly, right-upper quadrant pain, and ascites that occurs most commonly in the setting of high-dose chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The diagnosis can be confirmed on biopsy. Cemiplimab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor recently approved for the treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. There are currently no known reports of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related VOD/SOS. Case Description/Methods: A 58-year-old female with a history of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma of the left eye treated with six months of Cemipilimab presented with ascites. On admission, labs were notable for a total bilirubin of 1.2, mildly elevated liver function tests, alkaline phosphatase 884, and international normalized ratio 2.1. A diagnostic tap revealed a high SAAG ascites that was negative for infection. A comprehensive serological workup for viral, metabolic and autoimmune causes was unrevealing. A transjugular liver biopsy demonstrated a hepatic venous pressure gradient of 18mmHg, nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH), and portal venopathy. The patient was discharged on steroids but returned one month later for recurrent ascites and worsening bilirubin to 12.6 (direct 7.3);COVID PCR was negative. A full rheumatologic and vasculitis workup was unremarkable. Repeat biopsy (Figure 1) demonstrated moderate NRH changes, prominent central vein sclerosis with fibrous obliteration, signs of SOS/ VOD and central venulitis with fibrotic changes with sinusoidal portal hypertension. Discussion(s): VOD occurs most often with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and chemotherapeutic agents. Here we present the first case of checkpoint inhibitor-induced VOD/SOS. Despite discontinuation of the offending agent and a trial of steroids, the patient's clinical course continued to deteriorate. She eventually developed refractory ascites and portosystemic encephalopathy. She was deemed not a candidate for liver transplant given her underlying malignancy. She was transitioned to home hospice before further treatment, such as Defibrotide could have been pursued. VOD associated with immune checkpoint inhibition should be considered in the differential of patients who develop new onset liver dysfunction and ascites while receiving these medications (Figure Presented).

COVID-19 Outcomes in Patients with Cancer Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review.

Introduction: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can cause inflammatory and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) that might worsen the course of COVID-19. We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022307545) to evaluate the clinical course and complications of COVID-19 in patients with cancer receiving ICI. Methods: We searched Medline and Embase through January 5, 2022. We included studies evaluating patients with cancer who received ICI and developed COVID-19. Outcomes included mortality, severe COVID-19, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital admissions, irAEs, and serious adverse events. We pooled data with random effects meta-analysis. Results: Twenty-five studies met study eligibility (n = 36,532 patients: 15,497 had COVID-19 and 3220 received ICI). Most studies (71.4%) had a high risk of comparability bias. There were no significant differences in mortality (relative risk [RR] 1.29; 95% CI 0.62-2.69), ICU admission (RR 1.20; 95% CI 0.71-2.00), and hospital admission (RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.79-1.06) when comparing patients treated with ICI with patients without cancer treatment. When pooling adjusted odds ratios (ORs), no statistically significant differences were observed in mortality (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.57-1.60), severe COVID-19 (OR 1.05; 95% CI 0.45-2.46), or hospital admission (OR 2.02; 95% CI 0.96-4.27), when comparing patients treated with ICIs versus patients with cancer without ICI therapy. No significant differences were observed when comparing clinical outcomes in patients receiving ICIs versus patients receiving any of the other anticancer therapies. Conclusion: Although current evidence is limited, COVID-19 clinical outcomes of patients with cancer receiving ICI therapy appear to be similar to those not receiving oncologic treatment or other cancer therapies.

In This Issue

The article presents highlights from this issue of the publisher. Topics include information on Systemic lupus erythematosus and its response to Rituximab, durable treatment for Antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody associated vasculitis, and earlier recognition of immune checkpoint inhibitors induced inflammatory arthritis.

Postvaccination immune-mediated hepatitis: what do we really know?

Tweetable abstract The percentage of patients with immune-mediated vaccine-associated hepatitis is minimal compared with the number of patients vaccinated worldwide.

COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis vs. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myocarditis - Same but different

Background: While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) -induced myocarditis and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine-induced myocarditis are considered to be rare;they are both significant side effects, suggested being caused by activation of the immune system against the myocardium. We aimed to assess whether both phenomena share similar presenting characteristics. Method(s): We included patients diagnosed with either ICI or COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis at our medical center. We performed a retrospective assessment of clinical presentation, blood tests, and advanced echocardiography, including speckle strain. Result(s):We included 18 patients diagnosed with ICI (ICI group) or COVID- 19 vaccine (COVID-19 group)-induced myocarditis, and 20 patients with viral myocarditis (Viral group) as a control group. The median age was significantly older in the ICI group (74 years) compared to the COVID-19 and Viral groups (20 and 24 years), p<0.001. The clinical presentation in the COVID-19 group was more similar to the Viral group, presenting mainly with chest pain and fever, while the ICI group presented mainly with dyspnea. ST-elevation was frequent in the COVID-19 and Viral groups and absent in the ICI group, p=0.004. Median peak high sensitivity troponin I values were markedly lower in the ICI group compared to the COVID-19 and Viral groups (619 ng/L vs. 15527 ng/L vs. 7388 ng/L, p=0.004). While the median left ventricular ejection fraction was 60% among all groups, patients in the ICI group presented with mean lower LV global longitudinal strain (-13%) and left atrial conduit strain (17%), compared to the COVID-19 (-17% and 30%) and Viral groups (-18% and 37%), p=0.016 and p=0.001. Conclusion(s): While the suspected mechanism is an activation of the immune system in both ICI and the COVID-19 vaccine-induced myocarditis, we found that the clinical presentation, cardiac biomarkers, and advanced echocardiography of the COVID-19 vaccine, are more similar to viral myocarditis than to ICI-induced myocarditis.

A Case of Small Cell Lung Cancer with COVID-19 Pneumonia during Chemoimmunotherapy

Background. Many patients have contracted coronavirus infectious disease, emerged in 2019 (COVID-19) during lung cancer treatment. However, few reports of COVID-19 infection occurring during chemoimmunotherapy have been published. Case. The patient was a 50-year-old man with advanced small cell lung cancer who was undergoing chemoimmunotherapy. He presented with fever, anorexia, and contracted COVID-19, which led to pneumonia. Patients with lung cancer may be at increased risk for COVID-19 infection, which could worsen their prognosis. However, the patient's COVID-19 pneumonia improved with dexamethasone, and he was able to resume lung cancer treatment. Conclusion. Chemoimmunotherapy may lead to the development of severe disease in patients with COVID-19. COVID-19 pneumonia is often difficult to differentiate from lung injury caused by immune-related adverse events associated with chemoimmunotherapy. Upon the development of pneumonia, we should always suspect COVID-19, diagnose it early, and treat it appropriately. Furthermore, we need to carefully consider the resumption of lung cancer treatment after COVID-19, depending on the severity of residual fibrosis. © 2023 The Japan Lung Cancer Society.

A case of refractory pelvic squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary that responded to nivolumab.

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a heterogeneous group of metastatic tumors with a usually unfavorable prognosis. A 33-year-old female was diagnosed with pelvic squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary. The tumor was p16-positive, suggesting that it was human papillomavirus (HPV)-related. The tumor progressed for 4 months after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (initial treatment) and was refractory to paclitaxel plus carboplatin (second-line therapy). Liquid-based cancer genomic profiling identified five pathogenic variants, including Neurofibromin1 (NF1) (p.T1690Mfs*5); however, due to the lack of domestic clinical trials, the patient could not receive genome-based molecular-target therapies. Simultaneously, nivolumab was administered to the patient post its approval in Japan for CUP. The tumor responded to nivolumab, accompanied by decreased levels of tumor markers. NF1 mutations and HPV-related carcinogenesis may be associated with a favorable response to nivolumab treatment. It may therefore serve as a potential treatment against cancers of unknown primaries.

The Interplay of Lung Cancer, COVID-19, and Vaccines.

Patients with cancer are more susceptible to a higher risk of coronavirus infection and its severe complications than the general population. In addition, these patients were not included in the pivotal clinical trials for COVID-19 vaccines. Therefore, considerable uncertainty remains regarding the management of cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic and the safety of COVID-19 vaccinations in cancer patients. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge generated from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic on the vulnerability of cancer patients to the coronavirus disease, as well as the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in this population. We also discuss the available data on the effects of anticancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors on the immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 in cancer patients. Special attention in this review will be given to patients with lung cancer, as such patients are at an increased risk for severe effects from COVID-19.